Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Revising and Retraining for Greater Survival Rates

Six months after the American Heart Association formally adopted new guidelines for emergency cardiovascular care (ECC), national organizations are releasing newly revised training materials to help ensure that the practice of first aid, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation, conforms to the latest science available.
Under the 2010 "Guidelines for Emergency Cardiac Care," chest compressions, not airway concerns, have taken priority. The changes re-order the treatment steps from A-B-C to C-A-B. First aiders have been administering the former sequence for 40 years; the changes were precipitated by a better understanding of which actions actually increase survival rates.
When the new ECC techniques were announced, Dr. Ralph Sacco, AHA president, said, "The research behind the guidelines is telling us that more people need to do CPR to treat victims of sudden cardiac arrest, and that the quality of CPR matters, whether it's given by a professional or non-professional rescuer."
The National Safety Council, the American Red Cross, the Health & Safety Institute, and their affiliates are adopting the new guidelines. The sidebar on page XX offers a summary of 2010 first aid changes.

Revising Training Materials
Accepting the guidelines is relatively easy; the revision of training materials requires a greater investment of time and money. Dr. Michael Sayre, an AHA spokesman and emergency medicine physician at Ohio State University Medical Center, explained that AHA's comprehensive process actually started about two years ago.
"Because the schedule for reviewing scientific studies was well defined, the product managers could predict some of the changes that would be coming up, but not all of them," he said. "As various groups writing articles with the new science proceeded, the product managers had the chance to read the documents while still in press and could ensure that the changes would be incorporated."
AHA employs part-time specialists and professional writers to ensure training materials accurately reflect the scientific guidelines, Sayre added. "Each of these products is on a fairly rigorous, tight schedule. Many require video be shot and scripts approved. Someone with scientific knowledge has to make sure that the techniques being shown correctly demonstrate the skills we want people to do," he stressed.
Barbara Caracci, the National Safety Council's director of Program Development and Training, First Aid Programs, explained that a 12-minute instructor video that traditionally takes three months to produce has been fast-tracked to two weeks. NSC has targeted 10 classroom and four online programs for revision. Interim training materials were available in February, and many course materials were finalized by the start of the second quarter of 2011.

Retraining the First Aid Force
New guidelines also mean new training for companies and their employees. While some businesses provide first aid training because it is "the right thing to do," many are compelled by 29 CFR 1910.151(a) and (b). This OSHA standard requires employers to ensure that medical personnel are available to provide advice and consultation on plant health matters and "In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace . . . a person or persons shall be adequately trained to render first aid."
"With the Near Proximity Rule, if you are not in near proximity to definitive health care, you have to have trained responders and a first aid kit," explained Caracci, who has worked for the safety council for 30 years. "Near proximity" has been interpreted to mean within four minutes, she said, adding that "most businesses are not in near proximity to definitive health care."
In addition to these regulations, OSHA recommends companies keep their first aid training up to date with current techniques and knowledge. From any vantage point, that means businesses will need to retrain their first aid force, but not necessarily at greater cost. For example, if employees certified under 2005 guidelines have not yet reached their two-year renewal date, employers can wait until that deadline to advance to 2010 training. The general consensus is that training based on the 2005 guidelines is still valuable.
When training must be renewed, companies have several options. They can choose online, off site or on site, and train-the-trainer classes, or a combination of these.
Online training, which is not subject to regulation, can be offered by any company or organization. For example, one "free" online CPR course provides basic information and a short test. Those who pass are invited to order a downloadable certificate or wallet cards for $24.95. The process can take less than 10 minutes. The value of such training is debatable.
"None of us wants the equivalent of the puppy mill," Caracci said, adding that the National Safety Council is a competitor of AHA and the Red Cross, but the three try to work cooperatively.
"I sit on the committee that writes first aid guidelines. I've worked with these others at my same level for years," she explained. "We want people proficient in first aid. When we get these places where you pay 20 bucks and you get a card, that does a disservice to all of us who are working to get people trained properly."

Ensuring Effective Techniques
The council offers a blended approach, requiring those who want a completion card (which is different from a certificate) to take the online course and follow up with hands-on skills training with a local or chapter-based instructor. That training can take up to three hours.
AHA's online training uses experts in educational techniques and methods to ensure the association presents the information in a way that helps the person learning actually remember what to do in an emergency. "For certain things, like doing chest compressions, it's really important for students to practice skills, to do muscle memory," said Sayre. "With chest compression, you can learn something by reading about it. To do a good job, you need to practice. Frequency of the practice matters as well, but the practice doesn't have to take very long," he said. Nursing students practice as little as five minutes a month, he added.
Research supports using both training methods in tandem. The 2003 study "Classroom Versus Computer-based CPR Training: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Instructional Methods," by Robb S. Rehberg, Ph.D., found students can learn information and sequences equally well online and in the classroom, However, the study's authors noted that critical skills require direct contact with an instructor. As an educator, Caracci agrees. In the classroom, instructors can correct errors immediately and reinforce material. OSHA also recommends that training programs include instructor observation of acquired skills and written performance assessments.
The measure of CPR effectiveness relates to the percentage of people who walk out of the hospital following emergency cardiovascular care. Experts often cite Seattle, Wash., as a model for building success: It has widespread CPR training and a short time to EMS response and defibrillation, resulting in a 30 percent survival rate for witnessed ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, according to AHA. In contrast, the survival rate in New York City averages 1 to 2 percent.
Caracci noted that casinos achieve great save rates because they hire professional rescuers, require their security force to take training, install automated external defibrillators, and use security cameras to watch their customers.
Several studies have documented that AED-trained and -equipped responders saved twice as many lives as those who used only CPR, Sayre said. With the 2010 guidelines, CPR- and AED-trained employees should be empowered to be more than bystanders.
One warning: Reading up on the new guidelines and then using them in an emergency is not a good idea. "You need to act as you were trained to act," Caracci said, explaining that Good Samaritan protection is in force only when people use the skills they were trained to use -- even if that means calling 911, checking the victim's airway, administering mouth-to-mouth resuscitation, and then performing chest compressions.
"Anything you do will help," she said. According to an AHA Fact Sheet, effective bystander CPR, provided immediately after sudden cardiac arrest, can double or triple a victim's chance of survival.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

US Department of Labor's OSHA cites CTI-SSI Food Services of Wilder, Idaho, for safety violations; fines total $132,000

SEATTLE – The U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration has cited CTI-SSI Food Services LLC of Wilder, Idaho, with 15 serious, one repeat and one other-than-serious violation after an inspection of its facility identified a potential release of anhydrous ammonia and other workplace hazards. Proposed penalties total $132,000.

OSHA's area office in Boise began an investigation last year as part of a national emphasis program on chemical facilities.

"This employer disregarded industry-recognized hazards and exposed workers to the threat of serious injury or death associated with the potential release of anhydrous ammonia," said Dean Ikeda, OSHA's regional administrator in Seattle. "Additionally, OSHA identified serious electrical, lockout/tagout and fall hazards."

The serious violations involve inadequate process safety management, failing to provide fall protection and failing to provide electrical guarding protection. In addition, the employer did not require use of locking devices to make equipment safe during maintenance procedures. A serious violation occurs when there is substantial probability that death or serious physical harm could result from a hazard about which the employer knew or should have known.

A repeat citation was issued due to the lack of an employee alarm system that was audible or recognizable over other workplace noise. The company was cited for the same violation on March 7, 2008. A repeat violation exists when an employer previously has been cited for the same or a similar violation of a standard, regulation, rule or order at any other facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years.

Finally, the company was issued one other-than-serious citation for failing to monitor airborne chromium exposure. An other-than-serious violation is one that has a direct relationship to job safety and health, but probably would not cause death or serious physical harm.

CTI-SSI Food Services LLC, which provides cooked and uncooked meat for the fast food industry, has 15 business days from receipt of the citations to contest these findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. Prior to contesting, the employer can request an informal conference with OSHA's area director. To report workplace incidents, fatalities or situations posing imminent danger to workers, call the agency's toll-free hotline at 800-321-OSHA (6742).

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing safe and healthful workplaces for their employees. OSHA's role is to ensure these conditions for America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, education and assistance. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

No Prosecution for Company Blamed in London Rail CrashNo Prosecution for Company Blamed in London Rail Crash

Britain's Office of Rail Regulation announced March 18 it will not proceed with the prosecution of Jarvis Rail Limited, the maintenance company charged in the May 10, 2002, Potters Bar rail crash in London, which killed seven people – six passengers and a pedestrian struck by debris -- and injured more than 70. The crash happened because nuts were loose on spreader bars that keep the rails at the proper width for train cars, which caused one of four cars in a train to derail just outside the Potters Bar station.
Jarvis is in bankruptcy and insolvent, according to ORR, which said it concluded "there was a real risk that a prosecution in these circumstances could undermine public confidence in the regulatory and criminal justice systems."
ORR said it has enough evidence "to provide a realistic prospect of conviction of Jarvis [but] a prosecution would no longer be in the public interest" because the trial would be costly, long, and "if convicted lead to only a small financial penalty and delay the conclusion of the proceedings against Network Rail."
Network Rail owns and operates Britain's rail network. The company pleaded guilty in February 2011 to failing to properly install, maintain, and inspect adjustable stretcher bars. A hearing March 30 is scheduled to set a date for sentencing.
ORR is the independent safety authority for British railways. Investigative reports about the crash are available at this website.

CPSC, HUD Issue Updated Remediation Protocol for Homes with Problem Drywall

he Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are issuing an updated remediation protocol (pdf) for homes with problem drywall. A study (pdf) conducted on behalf of CPSC by Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico, finds no evidence of a safety hazard to home electrical systems. Sandia simulated long-term exposure of wiring and other electrical components to hydrogen sulfide gas, which is associated with problem drywall.
Based on this study, CPSC and HUD staff, representing the Interagency Task Force on Problem Drywall, are no longer recommending the removal of all electrical wiring in homes with problem drywall. This change in the government's protocol may reduce the cost of remediation for many homes.
After simulating more than 40 years of corrosive conditions that could exist in problem drywall homes, Sandia staff did not observe any acute or long-term electrical safety events, such as smoking or fire. Corrosion and blackening of the exposed electrical components did occur and was observed to be consistent with the characteristic corrosion reported to CPSC by thousands of consumers. Based on this study, it is the belief of the staffs of CPSC, HUD, and Sandia that long-term exposure of wiring and other electrical components to hydrogen sulfide gases does not indicate a safety hazard to a home's electrical systems.


With these changes, the remediation guidance for homes with problem drywall calls for the replacement of all:
  • problem drywall;
  • fire safety alarm devices, including smoke and carbon monoxide alarms;
  • electrical distribution components, including receptacles, switches and circuit breakers; and
  • gas service piping and fire suppression sprinkler systems.
CPSC and HUD staffs are also issuing an updated identification guidance (pdf), which broadens the range of installation years of affected homes to include homes where drywall was installed as late as 2009. Importantly, the drywall installed in 2009 had been previously imported during the years 2006-2007 and does not represent any new importation of problem drywall.
The staffs of CPSC and HUD believe that following the updated identification and remediation protocols (pdf) will enable homeowners to correctly identify homes containing problem drywall and comprehensively remediate those homes to address any potential health and safety issues associated with the problem drywall.
CPSC is in the final stages of completing its scientific investigation into problem drywall. For additional findings from the Interagency Drywall Task Force's investigation, visit www.DrywallResponse.gov.

British PPE Makers Take Aim at Counterfeits

The British Safety Industry Federation recently warned that fake PPE could cost lives in the UK construction industry, which accounts for more fatalities -- 30 in 2009/2010 -- than any other sector. BSIF urged managers in the industry to ensure only quality, CE-approved PPE is used.
Besides the fatalities, there were 2,585 major injuries and 5,651 less serious lost-time injuries, according to BSIF, which cited the Health and Safety Executive as the source of the data.
HSE regulations define PPE as "all equipment (including clothing affording protection against the weather) which is intended to be worn or held by a person at work and which protects him or her against one or more risks to his health and safety, e.g. safety helmets, gloves, eye protection, high-visibility clothing, safety footwear and safety harnesses." BSIF's announcement said, "The main requirement of the PPE at Work Regulations 1992 is that personal protective equipment is to be supplied and used at work wherever there are risks to health and safety that cannot be adequately controlled in other ways. The problem arises when organisations believe they are purchasing adequate PPE for the workforce, when in fact the products may be fake or illegal. Unfortunately, fake and illegal products being manufactured and sold within the PPE industry is an increasingly common problem. Over recent years, a plethora of items have entered the marketplace, from gloves to high-visibility vests, which have been produced using substandard materials. Often these products are finished such that, to the untrained eye, it is difficult, if not impossible, to identify that they are fake."
<a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh%3Dv8/3ad3/3/0/%2a/b%3B237001215%3B0-0%3B1%3B44123033%3B4252-336/280%3B40884369/40902156/1%3B%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp://clk.atdmt.com/MOV/go/301718376/direct/01/2731928" target="_blank"><img src="http://view.atdmt.com/MOV/view/301718376/direct/01/2731928"/></a><noscript><a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh%3Dv8/3ad3/3/0/%2a/b%3B237001215%3B0-0%3B1%3B44123033%3B4252-336/280%3B40884369/40902156/1%3B%3B%7Esscs%3D%3fhttp://clk.atdmt.com/MOV/go/301718376/direct/01/2731928" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://view.atdmt.com/MOV/view/301718376/direct/01/2731928" /></a></noscript>

"Many of these counterfeit products arrive in containers from the Far East and can be readily purchased via online auction sites or from street markets," said David Lummis, CEO of BSIF. "It is quite easy to buy containers of 'safety' equipment direct and, of course, without the correct quality control procedures in place, the buyer will not have a clue what they are purchasing, thereby endangering lives.
"It is not really surprising that purchasers of PPE are now more wary about procuring items as there is general confusion over certified products, mainly due to the counterfeit items, falsified certifications, and the potentially confusing CE symbol that stands for 'China Export.' Nevertheless, there are measures at hand to ensure employers are buying and supplying the correct equipment."
Lummis added, "Certified goods will always be paramount in the health and safety world, and being extra vigilent when looking after your workforce is essential when health and lives are at risk. By just being aware of the type of counterfeit items available on the marketplace and remembering that offers that seem too good to be true usually are, is a step in the right direction. Purchasing the right PPE is a big responsibility, and safety equipment that doesn't perform properly isn't just inconvenient, it may actually cost lives."

UNECE Offers Blueprint for Explosion Risk Regulations

A new booklet from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) offers help to countries that want to address the hazards in environments with a high risk of explosions, including mines, refineries, mills, and chemical plants. The "Common Regulatory Framework for Equipment Used in Environments with an Explosive Atmosphere" will serve as a blueprint for countries that lack such regulations and will help others align theirs with internationally harmonized best practices, according to UNECE.
The equipment to be used in these environments must be designed, installed, and maintained so it does not create sparks or open flames, and this testing and certification can be expensive. Manufacturers of the equipment often must test and certify their products for each country they enter, and this may not be cost-effective for smaller markets, UNECE notes, which may leave state-of-the-art equipment unavailable in such markets. The booklet will help to cure this situation.
The regulatory framework it explains is based on and encompasses international best practice and international standards, particularly standards from the International Electrotechnical Commission Technical Committee 31, Equipment for Explosive Atmospheres. It formally endorses the International Electrotechnical Commission System for Certification to Standards relating to Equipment for use in Explosive Atmospheres (the IECEx System) as the recommended global best practice model for verifying conformity to international standards.

Visit www.iec.ch for more information about Technical Committee 31.
"The UNECE framework regulation builds on the positive experience of multilateral schemes for assessing conformity to standards, such as the IECEx. Under these schemes, testing and certification are carried out through agreed procedures and by peer assessment," said Uwe Klausmeyer, a German winner of the IEC Lord Kelvin Award for his work in standardization. "These systems are transparent, fully democratic and self-financing."

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Application Period Open for Pipeline Safety Grants

The Technical Assistance Grants (TAG) program, in its third year, provides funding for engineering and scientific analysis of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipeline safety, as well as to foster open communication between the public and pipeline operators on pipeline safety and environmental protection.
The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) recently announced it is accepting applications for up to $1 million in grants to communities and non-profit organizations for work on pipeline safety issues affecting local communities.
“Communities can play a vital role in the safety and reliability of pipeline operations,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “The Department’s technical assistance grants are aimed at helping interested communities enhance their pipeline safety efforts at the local level.”
The Technical Assistance Grants (TAG) program, in its third year, provides funding for engineering and scientific analysis of natural gas and hazardous liquid pipeline safety, as well as to foster open communication between the public and pipeline operators on pipeline safety and environmental protection.
“PHMSA’s Technical Assistance Grants will continue to help local communities improve and expand their knowledge of pipelines and pipeline safety issues, as well as help to initiate discussions between the community and the pipeline operators,” said PHMSA Administrator Cynthia Quarterman.
Applications for the grants will be accepted until Feb. 28, 2011, and will be awarded by September 2011. Each grantee may receive up to $50,000. Previous grants have funded 46 projects in communities across 21 states.
Local government bodies, such as cities, towns, villages, counties, parishes, and townships, are eligible to receive the grants. Non-profit groups are also eligible. Corporations, companies, and other for-profit entities are not eligible, and the funding may not be used for lobbying or litigation.

Each TAG recipient must provide a report to PHMSA within one year demonstrating completion of the work as outlined in their grant agreement. PHMSA provides support and oversight throughout this process to ensure grantees achieve their expected outcomes.
TAG grants were created in the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 and first funded in 2009. TAG program recipients and their projects for 2009 and 2010 are listed here: http://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/tag.